Pictures Of Warts In Throat

. J’.ai already have l’.occasion to say it: Arnaud Montebourg m’.inquiète. Is necessary it to paraphrase the Socialists and to say qu’.il “. I do not know, but the fact is that, him which likes to speak in terms about registers, it is systematically in that of violence. When you combine that with l’.arrogance of which it makes proof, thus qu’.à its speech, impresses “. “., this virtue that Terror tried to d’.établir with great blows of guillotine, you will understand - at least, I l’.espère - that I do not joke, nor n’.exagère, that I find to him many airs of. However it is obvious qu’.Arnaud Montebourg will be a minister if Ségolène Royal is elected. Let us tremble a little: because of its d’.avocat activity, it could be even qu’.on entrusts Justice to him. Moreover, such qu’.est the guy, I hardly see ministries in which it would not make a damage. That is worth these developments to him. - we will be d’.accord, is shocking: when l’.on hears s’.engager like it does it in an election campaign, it seems to to me welcome to share the fate of its fellow-citizens. ”. would be it - one finds d’.ailleurs few people in France to wish it - and a harmonization would be useful. I am on the other hand in disagreement on the form, and l’.inutile violence of the matter. And I find with the speech d’.Arnaud Montebourg, of which it specifies itself qu’.il has “. were validated by the direction of countryside. With regard to the inconsistencies, let us reconsider, the time of some lines, the question of ḻ.harmonisation of the tax policies. Harmonization of the safety requirements, harmonization of the regulations of the products so d’.instaurer. Free-circulation of the people, free-circulation of the goods, free-circulation of the capital, here are three of the European economic objectives. But for that, it is necessary to harmonize. It is thus useless to vituperate. Necessary tax harmonization within l’.Union, c’.est a subject on which j’.ai myself roughed-hew in third cycle soon ten years ago. And c’.est very precisely what Montebourg. Here are what Jean Quatremer says very precisely “.Car, at the bottom, which wishes Montebourg. That the level of French imposition - on the companies and the individuals is regarded as a floor. In other words, the hexagonal tax system must be the referent of Europe even world. One includes/understands better, with such remarks, why the tax harmonization, however desirable in particular in the field of the IS, does not progress to Europe. But since that given pleasure with the voters antilibéraux…. However, as Quatremer raises it, it truly qu’.il believes would get clear an unspecified majority to adopt the French system. Of course, this n’.est qu’.un relative obstacle, since, in a rather dialectical vision, “. ”. must be driven out capacity, which should l’.établissement open the way with truth and justice in the world l’.Union n’.est not remained inactive. In fact well the States retain the latter lever of national policy qu’.est the taxation. It n’.y has d’.ailleurs qu’.à to imagine the reaction d’.Arnaud Montebourg if a harmonization on the average taxation in Europe were subjected to the vote…. Consequently, confronted with l’.évidente inanity of the matter, one is also challenged by his useless, and moved, violence, but also l’.interview qu’.il gave to a site, Betapolitique, “. This interview is surrealist. In middle the 20 minute old d’.un amalgamates total between the tax system, clearstream, the Swiss banking structure and the question of the “. “., Arnaud Montebourg speaks about tax peace and need for the dialogue…. a peace and a dialogue imposed by the force. Thus, Montebourg takes again its verse on the “. plundering of the large European countries. Because c’.est more reprehensible when c’.est made by a giant dwarf with l’.égard d’.un. 5′.20, for those which are in a hurry), the purple passage:. Montebourg, it, are civilized, it is satisfied with “. But the matter keeps like nauseous relents. In any case, for a call with the dialogue, acknowledge that that promises d’.être effective. And here are which entonne again l’.antienne developed in its platform on ḻ.opportunity d’.organiser a blockade of these countries. Blockade of Switzerland, of Monaco, of Luxembourg, of Lichtenstein…. and of Great Britain. Should it be recalled him that the last blockades of Great Britain met a success rather mitigated. It is in any event confusing d’.entendre a French person in charge, spokesman d’.une candidate with the Presidency of the Republic, to qualify five friendly foreign States of “. is not only smelled on these questions. I doubt, to tell the truth, qu’.il l’.ait informed of l’.emploi term “. And puisqu’.il left well, here is Montebourg which, by three times, explains qu’.il is necessary “. Switzerland does not understand that the report/ratio of force the Swiss ones include/understand only confrontation, they n’.acceptent that very seldom the dialogue And, to finish to gloss l’.image arrogant France with l’.étranger, the piece of bravitude with l’.égard of the “. ”. qu’.ils has recourse to a taxation faible…. “. Reassure you, people of Slovakia, France will not make you the war, it considers that your behavior is “. After s’.être released well to take pleasure in the anti-liberals, It finishes d’.ailleurs his matter by a verse “. ”. on its Swiss which, instead of answering on the bottom, “. reacted by d’.oiseaux names. really do not ‘.Savent to be held, these Swiss, hein…. Its interlocutor, in end d’.interview, indeed asked him for this qu’.il agreed to make, “. concretely, of what these actions would consist if the socialist party gained the presidential elections. And there, it is noted that, once last the time of the diatribe, c’.est the black hole, Royal way: I believe qu’.il is already necessary to put the questions and to obtain answers worthy of this name. Thus it is already necessary to accelerate the awakening of the madness of this tax war qu’.ils are delivering to us and then, it will be necessary to prepare measurements in. For l’.instant, I believe qu’.il is necessary to seek the dialogue with the Swiss authorities It seems well, indeed, that these véreux bankers, “. ”. n’.aient not seized qu’.Arnaud Montebourg addressed to them, in this way, a call with the dialogue, before setting up a blockade. And Arnaud Montebourg d’.illustrer finally, in splendid comic involuntary, its will of dialogue by refusing any maintenance with Swiss newspapers, or any debate with the aforementioned “. A solution, obviously, would be to confiscate their passport to them, or to make a “. ”. of their person but, to date at least, c’.est anticonstitutional [ J’.espère that Jean -, I ouais go l’.appeler Jean - will thank me for this good report [. Let us be frank, the diatribes anti-Switzerland de Montebourg do not like nobody especially but the tone n’.est not really of circumstance. Yesterday evening at infra-red (TSR), Dory Leuthard, our fringuante federal adviser, put the feet in (good the) flat one. It estimated that the fixed prices d’.impôt were unjust (parce qu’.uniquement intended the abroads) and qu’.il was necessary to abolish them. Qu’.il has there, on the bottom, of the things to be re-examined, to discuss, c’.est probable. Moreover, the war-horse qu’.il enfourche n’.en is not one: everyone is convinced of the d’.harmoniser need the tax policies, at the very least within l’.Union. That can remain acceptable so much qu’.Arnaud Montebourg n’.était qu’.un appointed among d’.autres, representing before all itself. Ca l’.est more lorsqu’.il s’.agit of the spokesman d’.une possible President of the Republic, and d’.un probable - in this case - minister. And l’.on cannot quite simply agree to thus see qualifying five States of “. That l’.on is or not within the framework d’.une election campaign. I m’.étonne d’.ailleurs qu’.il n’.ait not taken down a role in Jacou Crunching it (which must leave very soon on the screens) …. It is on France 24 opposite Will dribble in this moment…. I thus said that this same Arnaud Montebourg compared the riots of Suburbs of November 2005 with the jacqueries of old times …. I m’.étonne d’.ailleurs qu’.il n’.ait not taken down a role in Jacquou Crunching it (which must leave very soon on the screens) …. Of the old men relants imperialists on l’.ingérance of the foreign states. J’.imagine qu’.il would have evil to swallow that the United States comes to impose tax choices to him on the sovereignty of l’.EURO. J’.ai of loupé quelquechose on l’.entrée of Switzerland in l’.Union Européenne, perhaps that him also d’.ailleurs. Except that d’.autres advantageous tax country exists all over the world. Lastly, Montebourg fortunately always its “.liberté of penser”. unfortunately not that to reflect before speaking. One n’.aime not to see itself in a mirror, but, I will think of it, I wonder whether you n’.êtes not a type in the style of Montebourg. J’.ai read some of your articles, or alternate passion, l’.emphase, the ram recoveries, and often s’.ajoute the will to document the matter well. When you n’.êtes not in his camp, c’.est true that Montebourg has the gift d’.agacer, but often there are ideas, remarks to be taken into account. And d’.ailleurs, who aggravates you more in this history of Montebourg or Halliday. Ah but I n’.ai not made I precisely believe that this absurd idea came from the friends of Montebourg. One best is seldom placed for good to judge itself. But I am not certain to make proof of the systematic violence of which made Montebourg proof. Undoubtedly, but which speaker. The way in which it mouché recently the PEN in Arlette Chabot was (for those which l’.ont considering) one moment ḏ.anthology. Its engagements against bleaching d’.argent, the tax havens or ḻ.impunity of the politicians who prick in the case have gueule… nevertheless. and of constancy. A little morals in ambient cynicism, a little flamboyance in the set language généralisée…. to use with moderation. An impetuous thorough-bred which needs sometimes d’.être “.cadré”. Who tells you d’.ailleurs qu’.il will be a minister of Ségolène Royal. L’.émission of which you speak, c’.est “. If so, we really do not n’.avons the same perception of the things. As for morals, this n’.est not it which would lead me to treat five States of “.verrues”. Not really what j’.appelle of morals. And for the spokesman of the candidate of the second party of France, this n’.est not either what j’.appellerais of l’.excès, but of ḻ.irresponsability. For the remainder, if you remove excesses, its speech is d’.une obvious banality. What scandalizes me so much at the Socialists they are their contradictions, their lack of sincerity and permanent arrogances. These voters still did not understand that one carries out them in boat. How can one would be only one second to add faith to the repetitive self-evident truths of Montebourg fanfaron and with only and single advertising postures of their candidate. That there are still voters to adhere to this kind of speech and to now run behind an advertising dream leaves me pantoise. But j’.admets qu’.on can have another perception (it will undoubtedly be the case also after le(s) Sarkozy-royal debate). C’.est even more striking to note that Montebourg speaks without knowing its subject. A bunch d’.idées preconceived, and not large thing d’.autre. C’.est like that and that undoubtedly will be exploited, like d’.habitude, a blow of dés…. Thus, Montebourg takes again its verse on the Swiss "methods of predation", the exercise of "plundering of the large European countries". If this basic fact t’.était unknown, I m’.étonne not that the remainder of l’.analyse is a more arts person than political. When the revocation of l’.Edit of Nantes led to the escape the Protestants, they made the fortune of the close countries. Montebourg should learn all l’.Histoire from France instead of focusing itself over the merry time of the guillotine. Its aspect “.beau kid sympa”. hiding place a quite black heart, seems-T-il…. Like Royal Ségolène, d’.ailleurs. The problem of a number of militants, c’.est qu’.ils remains between them to assemble the bourrichon, to overbid in the rejection of l’.autre camp. That relates to all the parties. In term of propaganda at best, l’.effet is null, in the worst case against productive. What me m’.afflige, this n’.est not of reading here some of the comments, but of knowing that I find the same ones in my party [ quote comment=”.391″.]Qui says you d’.ailleurs qu’.il will be a minister of Ségolène Royal. The file with load against Sarkozy three times thicker than the program of the PS is in this same vein. J’.ai l’.impression that they are the traitors who gained aujourd’.hui: this n’.est certainly not parce qu’.ils is most democratic. in fact Montebourg does nothing but translate and develop l’.idée founder of Holland: “.je n’.aime not riches”. Ah that will go, that will go, that will go, the rich person one them pendra.Dans the same kind, the Chinese must be delighted because they are saved, Sego their promised them aider.Probablement to have a growth rate 4 times less than theirs Mieux, it returned from Pekin by renting the speed of justice in China. If you speak d’.honnêteté intellectual, c’.est alarming for your other values. There is a doctor in the room to look after them (appreciated dermatologist). As [ quote comment=”.411″.]Le file with load against Sarkozy three times thicker than the program of the PS is in this same veine.[/quote ] these attacks are as nauseous as l’.ingominieux “.rapport”. laid by the PS. With when the re-establishment d’.une poitic police force like Stasi. The friends of Marie-Ségolène know her operation well. Not but seriously the French will leave berner by this speech of hatred tinted of xenophobia. J’.ai spoken in another subject about l’.évidente resemblance enters the strategy of com’. of SR and the PEN, in here is still a striking example [ quote comment=”.404″. ] And for Montebourg, c’.est the same thing. And now, that I will make of all this time, which will be my life (with an air of music known behind). In duplex with the “.Coulisses of Bruxelles”., my response on ḻ.accusation of social-souverainisme with l’.égard of Montebourg: I believe that ḻ.accusation of “.social-souverainisme”. with l’.égard of Montebourg is beside the plate. Already it is false to say that Montebourg thinks that France is white white in this business. L’.ire de Montebourg s’.attaqe thus as much with the tax practices of the cantons d’.Oswald or Geneva qu’.à those envisaged of Sarkozienne France. C’.est the will d’.opposer a national véto with any decision considered to be bad for the Nation - and “.donc”. the Social one - catch democratically at the European level. For example to refuse ḻ.application of the Directive Services, even once voted with a very great majority with the Council and the European Parliament. Who walls himself here behind the ramparts of national sovereignty. They are the partisans of tax competition, c’.est the Luxembourg Minister for the treasure, c’.est the president of ḻ.association of the Swiss banks. On which side is the will supranational d’.ingérence. Thus me it seems to to me that the two positions which s’.affrontent are a tax souveraino-liberalism d’.un side, and social-mondialisme of l’.autre. J’.ai l’.impression that they are the traitors who gained aujourd’.hui: this n’.est certainly not parce qu’.ils is most democratic. Passionant this édito of Philippe Valley. The traitre c’.est Jaurès, the cretin c’.est Guesde and not l’.inverse. at the greens: at the time of l’.investiture of their candidate, Cecile Duflot (cretin) EXIT with the profit of the traitres Voynet and Cochet anti-liberal left: exit [ quote comment=”.411″.]Cela confirms l’.impression that j’.avais: Royal Segolene n’.aime not s’.entourer able people qu’.elle….[/quote ]. One n’.attaque step a woman on her capacitude. Montebourg is an excellent powerful orator sophist. It could have raised the debate on tax ḻ.harmonisation etc. Ca generates buzz, c’.est sure, but that does not return anybody more intelligent…. Enthusiastic opponent with the TCE, it found in carries-parolat Royal excellent platform to prolong his work. What could be to better put an end to l’.Europe that d’.insulter all those which surround us. Completely mea culpa on the traitors and the cretins. Nevertheless, I continue to place Montebourg in the cretins. Very with the most worrying fact but c’.est qu’.apparemment it has total freedom of débilitude in its role of carries-parole…. I think of speaking for many people, but c’.est what everyone hopes for One hopes for all to speak between people about good company. One s’.inquiète of Montebourg and his remarks primarily parce qu’.il is potential minister. Thus it could make dégats if it starts to act like it parle…. Montebourg is dangerous, finally, especially for the PS. I am not sure that its last exit saved points with SR. Would be also very curious to know what Montebourg thinks of the reform of the CAP, the future of l’.UE without the treaty constitutionel, etc…. One should not be deçu either. You bring back le”.trou noir”. as a response of Montebourg to concrete questions. J’. have the feeling that c’. is one of its specialities. Strong Trés in mouth, with the limit of l’. insult to l’. regard of its political adversaries, it seems difficult to him to produce another thing that of the diatribe. Remember the debate on the 2 joining together it with Bayrou, the PEN and Devedjian. Its choice as spokesman accentuates, s’. it of it was need, l’. ambiguity of Ségolène. It would be time at 100 days of l’.élection Présidentielle to start to think of building a program. And still can one read a little low than “.La socialist candidate has d’.ores and already pointed out the principles which will guide its action on the subject, discusses “.légitime and even indispensable”. for the élections”. Thus it awaits qu’.on once more says what to him to put in its program. Who can still support that this woman has an unspecified credibility. Chirac is anxious, c’.est to say little: It finds that the couple Ségolène Royal/Montebourg would be more dangerous than Sarkozy, with the head of France. And one cannot say that, since 1974 qu’.il is in policy, it is not an expert of the values of the political personalities. Chirac is anxious, c’.est to say little: It finds that the couple Ségolène Royal/Montebourg would be more dangerous than Sarkozy, with the head of France. And one cannot say that, since 1974 qu’.il is in policy, it is not an expert of the values of the political personalities. The hearsays are not necessary in this countryside already rather turbid. Not d’.ajouter need for the rumours without bases pushed by curiosity, j’.ai open this site.Gens of convictions, always you will m’.apparaitrez like the extraones. “.Gens of convictions, always you will apparaitrez me like extraterrestrial... ”. Quid of those which are deprived by it as that does not smell good here. All that is told here which fabrics d’.inepties. Funny C’.est for each adjective that you use against Montebourg me I see the tete sarko. has share to defend your end of fat, you find to him what with the dwarf of garden. Its economic assessment ____, assessment on justice is saying good: but it not finally in short has rates of resolution higher than 100% incredible. It will have time d’.aller to look after its warts:. This known as it is hard with him of requiring of him l’.impossible: “."Je said to him that its remarks were moved. I want that my spokesman treats. That carried out by means of the five directions, namely its physical primary education level of the phenomena. That carried out by means of the designs mental (logic, calculation, imagination, memory, language, interactivity of the interpersonal units of “.conscience”., etc. The power of l’.argent is there for much in this “.omerta”. to which the professionals of the media of it are accessory. The bleaching of l’.argent is a serious thing trés and prégnante from the change of nature of international and world ḻ.economy in a strongly financiarized total econoimy. Only one serious dysfunction of this globalized labyrinth can lead thousands of people to the disaster, and by rebound l’.Etat and the company by a possible operation ḏ.indemnisation. The current dynamics of world ḻ.economy does nothing but reinforce more and more the vital need for this collaboration with l’.avantage of all the monde.B: I am free of all appatenance of political party. To say d’.un country that c’.est a wart is offensive at all. Moreover, lorsqu’.Ahmadinejad known as d’.Israël that c’.est a tumour, that does not lend to consequence. …. Like what it n’.est not necessary d’.être member d’.un left to show partisan… outrageusement. …. Nor d’.être a political leader to handle the set language. And I pass on the liberally distributed pleonasms. [ …. ] j’.ai l’.intention not to lose it well - qu’.ils will always find in me an enthusiastic defender of national ḻ.honnor [ …. ]. Trackback, to use in accordance with the uses which prevail on the matter (if doubt. to be informed of the future comments by Etre mall informed of the new tickets on Koztoujours by European Union mall: for a forced and distorted competition. EU: of a dispatch, of some inversions, and Gruyere with a hole, I discover a draughtsman with the feature more ambitious than d’.autres. Francois, Marielle, Francoise. Liberal, vis-a-vis with its calf's liver, said to me in a smile which my irritation with respect to Francois Bayrou was more than perceptible. We spoke about it because j’.évoquais l’.idée d’.un ticket memorandum to recall me to make the account of the choices of the Modem at the following day of the local elections. With a less level, I think of my city, Rueil-Malmaison, in which, not insane, the Modem will not n’.iront to join. You will not n’.oublierez to point out it to me, n’.est this not. This n’.est not that I find this irrational behaviour, not. C’.est only about also aggravating to surprise a US champion of the moral crusade badgering its assistant. Then, one says to me: “.tu make a fixette on Bayrou. When an old injury falls beside Ségolène Royal, that it makes." or "French, one lies you, one despoils you". This information must be relativized for three series of reasons, classified l’.ordre of the more idiot to most relevant. I do not begin more idiot: not, this n’.est not a bad news. Sight the current patouille, 60%, c’.est all the same of l’.ordre of good the perf. Then, it is obviously necessary to take this survey for this qu’.il is: photography d’.une simple perception. I must concede that, for my part, I n’.accorde qu’.une confidence relative to my perception d’.une economic policy. J’.ai intellectually traumatized by my courses ḏ.economy of second. Also m’.essaie I with ḻ.efficacity me too. However you appear that Francois Bayrou was taken in obvious offence of characterized lie, and public. C’.est not me which says it. like says it Jean-Pierre Raffarin. A matter can be right, can be juridically rigorous, it can also be politically inconceivable. Polemists in evil of existence. Ca ṉ.exist, that ṉ.exist pas…. And why not. Yes, j’.ai thought that the kikadi had known its hour of glory. L’.affaire is heard: this Monday was the day of “.la mediatization of ḻ.operation of Villiers-le-Bel”. Not the day of ḻ.operation of Villiers-the-Beautiful, that of “.la mediatization of ḻ.operation of Villiers-le-Bel”. And each one, of the blogs with the JT, d’.embrayer on this actu, only, the true one: the criticism of the mediatization. Francois Bayrou and Ségolène Royal bring out the lexicon of the great words. The latter sees “.un dysfunction there engraves our république”., while at the same time we are in elective monarchy. L’.affaire, definitely, is thus heard: the capacity organized a media circus around this business. It n’.est even not need to stress that l’.opposition is legitimate: c’.est an obviousness. Some lose however the direction of measurement in all good conscience. Charging to Nicolas Sarkozy a theoretical violence, they excuse by advance their own carelessness. It s’.agit not of victimiser Nicolas Sarkozy, not more than her supports. And l’.opposition is a foreseeable data. It is appropriate, as much as possible, to manage it. What n’.exclut not d’.en to underline the drifts. Call with media vigilance: a man with dismantled cranium walks on plates of television by trying d’.incarner the Republic. He is known services of vigilance to have d’.ores and already removed Marianne, which s’.exprime since a few years only under its constraint. However, its methods are hardly advisable, and do not raise obviously of the perfect transparency, nor of the expensive virtue with Robespierre. Qualified, dynamic, courageous, sympathetic nerve. Except with s’.étonner d’.une coherence which does not jump to the the least informed eyes of. Thus Dominique de Villepin, Francois Bayrou and Ségolène Royal make, according to l’.expression of the Barber, “. common face against Nicolas Sarkozy ”. and denounce a “.monarchie élective”., in a good boursoufflé “. Oui, I make in the people but I do not resist. Qu’.elle true C’.est is beautiful and that that emmerde. Those which l’.écoutaient yesterday when it supported Royal say aujourd’.hui qu’.elle n’.a not voice. During a few hours, “.ça”. will turn around. The first of the new First Injury, in a difficult context. It was said and writes that Nicolas Sarkozy called his advisers and his majority to show coolness. L’.appel is nothing less than superfluous. Probably accustomed so that Nicolas Sarkozy is lucky, those s’.égayent in the difficulty. Ca forgets that the glorious processions, that can s’.achever under the grapeshot. There is however at least a good reason to be calmed: for the local elections, the gadin is acté. It will certainly be necessary to hold account of the good vintage 2001 (Paris except) as pointed out it Jean-Pierre Raffarin. But good, Boboland should remain, helped on the left in that by a flight campaign high of François de Panafieu, aka. It n’.y hardly has apparently in the large cities, that Marseilles and Bordeaux which are really “.sauvables”. They eat to him in the hand There had been “.Sarkozy made peur”., which s’.est lamentably failed on the reality of the vote. There was “.Sarkozy President, c’.est fire in all the pays”. There was also the “.Sarkozy holds the medias”. Marianne s’.était worried: was going one “.encore to be able to write ça.”.…. And then, 214 000 results for “.Sarkozy and medias”. They eat to him in the hand. Ina-Ich, it is not of Pink Martini. Ina-Ich is a white dove which has been just posed on the new scene rock'n'roll Frenchwoman. One thinks of them what l’.on wants and l’.on n’.est necessarily not forced d’.y to see a special occasion of rejoicing. resigned of its functions of president of the Modem. François intervened directly, telephoned with everyone. Ségolène Royal unscrews in the Oui surveys, yes, yes, yes, yes. C’.est which I start to know you. You will say to me that it would not be principal ḻ.information of this new battery of surveys. You will leave the words which annoy, to tell me “. J’.envisage d’.ailleurs d’.écrire to Nicolas, on this subject. Francois Bayrou, c’.est l’.Europe. C’.est in genes, the tripe, all the pores of its skin. Francois Bayrou, c’.est Parliament. C’.est in genes, the tripe, all the pores of its skin. For those which would doubt of what follows, Francois Bayrou had declared,: “.je will vote this traité”., specifying certainly qu’.il would do it without enthusiasm, which nobody asked him moreover. The victory while singing opens the barrier to us. L’.affaire Kerviel is worrying and the least that l’.on can say is that confidence in the French banking structure out of spring incredibly shaken. this ticket d’.AB Galiani, on the blog d’.Alain Lambert. They have all the hangover. Such an amount of d’.années d’.investissement in policy, of confidence in the dialogue with the citizens, of pedagogy, to arrive from there. Putain…. With solfé, in fédés, that depresses. And me, I want to say to them: comrades, do not lower the arms. You know it, we do not n’.avons the same ideas precisely. But, when you were in difficulty, broken down basic. And like known as the canticle: even the blackest cloud always has its fringe d’.or. It is still too early to have a useful idea about the Attali report/ratio. It is especially too early, in all humility, so that I can m’.en do one. L’.aspect catalogues "plurisolutionnel" this object political iconoclast does not facilitate the task of ḻ.observator. Always is it that Nicolas Sarkozy asked this man there and his advisers, d’.identifier the bolts of the growth and d’.élaborer the keys allowing to open them (. This commission us thus forged 316 of them. The “.confiance”., says one, is in Bern these days. “., the General Company - my bank, it should be said in passing - lost 4 900 000 000?. Bruno Frappat n’.a not completely wrong to point out qu’.en frank, we would have spoken about 32 000 000 000…. In homage to a long family tradition of heads of. The record of the turn of the world to the veil as a recluse, like any notable performance, causes a sudden renewal d’.intérêt for the discipline, the sea, its romanticism. For proof, this splendid ticket d’.Hugues - a true feather - Thirty-five days (or almost) without seeing the ground, of which I will deliver only the hat to you:. Impossible not to preserve a trace of it. Francois, Marielle, Francoise. Retention of safety: my proposal with 1st President Lamanda.”. or “.Français, one lies you, one you spolie”. Hopes and despair of the “.petits blancs”. of Sarkozy (.: @ sys4 You were done. Club-footed Google is crawling this site. On France information and @si one A learns a new episode: pepito, to in no case one should not be delighted by dead somebody, even if seems to go in the "good direction". After having recently heard that the CRAF would not be weakened, that made pleasure d?2, alias Raoul Reyes, was gone down by l?Et Pleynel yesterday evening on C+: worse than Kahn. Nay each morning it is a happiness of obviousnesses. it is of worse deaf person only that which does not want to hear Nay, that appears so obvious when you it listenings that it is surprising which they are if little to notice it Thais: perhaps not I do not see with Montpellier share. A small return on the polemic to two balls of the week, by Catherine Nay cilia: I do not include/understand because those which are with unemployment do not cotisent it is only valid for flow (input/output) Effigy: by reading this article I thought of you guesses why except that there is a means simple to short-circuit this mistrust, count the number of cotisants and evaluate the curve of this figure. It should not technically be impossible to set up but to be honnete with me even I abound in this direction Ci as except as I thought that ACDC was a group of music beh yes that planes for it. @DelphineD: you saw the sign above it, it is that the stage about which you speak. On the Thai bond, at the beginning, I have the painful impression, during the list of the cities, of a stage of the turn of France with the local miss who smiles stupidly. It is seen well that Royal does not listen to anything, that it awaits just the signal to give the bouquet to the winner, forgiveness, to make its speech. A few months ago, I would have found that funny, there, that me drunk I had seen there is two days this history of fountaine but I do not manage to view your bond koz (surely my matos) of the heavy one: France in war of religion etc on another side, one never should say Fountaine it boils literally Fountaine behind during all the speech. I imagine that that must be when SR refuses the right to speak to Fountaine at a parliamentary sitting of area. AV to oir: the video one announced by Margit: Ben I seek, I seek EFF, but I do not find in substance it would be rather him mème, since ils' moves away from its "cards", this being I would like to see this article precisely, the past is a ball only if one cannot free oneself some with reason and respect. And I am not able to find it to you, but I read an article this morning which said that at one time of its speech, NS had obviously taken distance with its fiches.je would say readily that it is rather good when it is freed from its speech and/or that the inspirateur/trice of this speech can be félicité(e) cilia, are realistic (not royalist:) ) that as well means economies between the gazelles and the sparrowhawks good, Ben since nobody spoke about it today, and that I want to believe that it is a very good news You must?e enregistr?our take part: Contact me to obtain your password. Enter the terms which you seek. 170 passers by already passed simultaneously. Measure of statistical audience KING webanalytics by. The important thing is not to succeed, which never lasts, but to have been there, which is ineffaceable to engage, it is to adhere to an imperfect cause